In science fiction literature, and literature in general,
form can really hinder or help a story in terms of its presentation to the
reader and how much the reader can understand what is happening. For example,
in Ursula K. Le Guin’s story “The New Atlantis”, she implores a first person
narrative, with snippets of future characters asking what happened to the
original main characters. I believe this is an interesting tactic, but it ends
up providing no context for the story, in my opinion, and I believe she should
have opened the world to a little more exposition instead and it would have
brought me in more as a reader. Throughout the course of the story, there are
subtle hints to the world not being the way it should be, such as when Belle
describes the “National Forest Preserve” as the “…largest forest left in the
United States…” (Guin, 318). The reader is then left to wonder what happened to
the United States to have only one large forest, and with more details coming
through such as Phil’s invention to harness solar radiation as energy and Belle
even possibly being arrested for “unreported pregnancy” (Guin, 335) the reader
must try and put together the pieces of what has happened in the world and caused
the government and such to be this way. Personally, I’m not a big fan of this
as I find heavy world building a much better way to talk about things in a
story and while this creates a certain picture the way Guin does it, it most certainly
creates a blurry one. In “Bloodchild”, a short story by Octavia E. Butler, she
also provides a first person narrative in a story about long legged, almost
centipede like aliens who use humans as hosts to bear their children, and then
patch them up again. The story is presented from the view of a child, Gan, as
somebody who was chosen by his T’lic alien T’Gatoi, to bear her children when
the time comes. Now when exposition is needed to find out how humans came to be
on this planet in their “Preserve” and used as these hosts Gan just thinks
about what happened and explains it, such as firearms being illegal in the
preserve because “ There had been incidents right after the Preserve was
established – Terrans shooting T’lic, shooting N’Tlic” (Butler, 12) and this
perfectly establishes the world and tells me, as the reader what happened. What
I’m basically saying is worlds should be built, to an effect, and the form of
the story and the narrative can either help with that, such as “Bloodchild” or
hinder that, such as with “The New Atlantis”.
Le Guin, Ursula K. The New Atlantis. 1975. Text.
Butler, Octavia E. Bloodchild. Davis Publications Inc, 1995. Text.
No comments:
Post a Comment